SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (89432)1/25/2000 2:53:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (2) of 1580419
 
Fudd, <that's what my dictionary says too, but I think the definition is incomplete.>

You id1ot. You "think"! Who the hell you think you are?
The whole panel of recognized people was working
on these definitions, all academia and scholars agree,
but you, Elmer Fudd, disagree!

What an event! Now we all should try to stretch
general definitions to suite our personal goals!

What a nice idea of Elmer Fud: re-define a definition
if it does not look nice to you!

There is the established definition, and when people
talk about the price war, they mean exactly
what reputable people agreed upon, not what some
idiot thinks to justify ugly actions of the company
he heavily invested in. Read again the main clause,
our home-grown philosopher:
"successfully lowers prices .. to force .. competitors
out of business." This is clearly the explicit condition
for the definition to be applicable.

AMD, by THE DEFINITION of its' size, cannot force
Intel out of competition. By definition.

When AMD lowers their prices, this does not fall
under the established definition. Period.

Therefore what Intel is doing all the time is the
ugly Price War. By definition. Again. No matter how
hard you try to reduce your discomfort about that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext