Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (89458)	1/25/2000 3:03:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (3) of 1580053

Paul, <You know that AMD was desperate in having to JACK UP the voltage of the AthWIPEY just to get too 800 MHz.> Why this bother you so much? Intel had to do this to get to 733. Why does that not bother you? <Their process has hit a brick wall - and rather than fine tune their process, they JUICE UP the power supply.> From all indications 0.18 at Fab25 is moving along fine. Just look at the availability on the 800s and the ever improving product launches with 850 launch within weeks from now. Also, if you think AMD will push Fab25 as much as Intel is pushing its process then think again. Very soon Fab25 will not be the main fab for high-end products. <Clearly, AMD is going to make sever compromises to get to 1 GHz.> Man, you are living in a different world. Fab25 is already yielding at 1G and Dresden has put AMD well past 1G. Dresden is where most (if not all) of the future microprocessor cores will come from. <And POWER CONSUMPTION will go way higher than the 48 watts now burned by the 800 MHz AthWipey.> So what? You should be glad that lets Intel have a little bit of breathing room in the mobile space. Chuck

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next