SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 496.34-0.2%3:56 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John F. Dowd who wrote (37108)1/25/2000 9:27:00 PM
From: Ex-INTCfan  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
John,

What changed your mind? Anyway, an attorney should take it on contingency.

To: INTCfan who wrote (36656)
From: John F. Dowd
Sunday, Jan 16 2000 4:41PM ET
Respond to Post # 36657 of 37114

INTCfan: No. Very difficult to sue the government. Tougher yet is proving the source of the leak.JFD

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (36652)
From: INTCfan
Sunday, Jan 16, 2000 4:32 PM ET
Reply # of 37114

from your link, re: <In a teleconference, Ballmer said he believed the talk of a break-up was purposely leaked by Justice Department officials in hopes of pressuring Microsoft to settle quickly.

"I believe the leaks are deliberate. I don't think there's any doubt about that," Ballmer said.>

A point to ponder. If it could be proven that the leaks were deliberate, and that at any point in time this reduced shareholder value, could the shareholders file a class action lawsuit against the DOJ? I imagine a suit in the amount of a hundred billion dollars or so might get someone's attention.

INTCfan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext