SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : QDEL - Quidel more quick diagnosis
QDEL 24.35+14.3%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike Relyea who wrote (689)4/25/1997 11:23:00 AM
From: DeadHead   of 1693
 
If you look at the 5-year chart on QDEL, you'll notice that it's only been below 3 twice in 1995. It was then followed by a nice run up to 7 in 1996. For what it's worth under the current circumstances, there is some historical support at 2.5.

I've been thinking about the patent lawsuit and what are QDEl's alternatives.

Assuming there is merit to this BD lawsuit:

* They could settle, which will probably cost them some money and a cut into their profits.

* They could defend themselves in court. Anything can happen there.

* They also might pay some penalty for 'damages done' and then over time reengineer their tests in some way so as not to infringe on the patent.

Then, what if there is little or no merit to the lawsuit? You have to wonder if the patents held by BD and Unipath are broad enough to encompass all possible technologies for test strips. What about Chemtrak and Tinity Biotech? Are their test-strip technologies also threatened by these patents. I know all of these companies, including Quidel, have patents of their own, so the validity of this lawsuit is not as cut-and-dry as some of us would think.

Sure BD is a big company that can hire an army of lawyers. But I don't believe our patent courts have degenerated to the point that money is the only deciding factor in a patent lawsuit.

The bottom line is that the market appears to be reacting to the news with little real information on the lawsuit or Quidel's alternatives. I think the fact that some of the bigger investors have been buying on the dips says a lot more than a bunch of us little guys panicking and driving the stock down on relatively low volume.

I don't mean to underplay the danger here, because it's there. It's just not as much of a done deal as the stock price seems to indicate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext