SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : USRX

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brendan W who wrote (17680)4/25/1997 1:13:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen   of 18024
 
Brendan, if the merger is not approved by shareholders, then this particular deal is off. At that point I suppose they could try again, but I have no experience with this sort of thing. Re details or justifications for the fixed exchange rate...No, none were offered that I remember. But if you were making the deal representing one or the other, I think you would have wanted it written up in the same way: They took the market value of the cos. before the market knew about the merger, while the market was still valueing them as separate entities. Then they decided from there what the cos. were worth, and then the deal was struck. If I had been either Casey or Eric, I would have wanted a FIRM FIXED exchange rate also. I can't blame Eric Benhamou for not wanting the value of his "currency" to fluctuate with the whims of the market place. This way both cos. have to rise and fall together, to keep the deal at the agreed upon terms.

DK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext