SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (89801)1/26/2000 5:48:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) of 1573988
 
Jim - RE: "Looks like INTC wasn't so altruistic after all. DELL is done. Insert the fork. Another Intel casualty. Another great call by AMDroids. <G> Someone give Mikey D Jerrys phone number. <G>"

But Jim, Intel made $0.69 in Q4, so who cares what happens to Dell and Gateway? Why should Intel care about their customers as long as "yields are good, ramp is fine"?

jajajajajajaja

"The company said an inconsistent flow of key semiconductor components and a slower-than-expected rebound in sales to corporate and institutional customers related to the Y2K rollover were primary reasons for the shortfall."

Gee, did Intel lead Dell down the wrong route?

DRDRAM is such a great product it couldn't be that.

And yield and ramp is fine for FLOPPERMINE so there is no way in the world it could be that, is there?

Demand must have been so GREAT that Intel couldn't satisfy everyone. But Intel's IABG revenues and profits don't hint towards that.

Too bad Mr. Dell won't drive over to AMD's place. Intel will make more promises to him, like DRDRAM is the next big thing, FLOPPERMINE will win new orders.

Who would have thought over one year ago that one of the best stocks in the 90s would be a DOG in '99 and who knows how long in '00...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext