SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (30064)1/26/2000 8:19:00 PM
From: Scott C. Lemon  Read Replies (1) of 42771
 
Hello Paul,

I need to reread the original lawsuit again, but one of the interesting facts in this case was the fact that Microsoft was "extending" Java with their own classes and "native methods". I believe that this was the root of Sun's issue ... since Microsoft would try to get developers to write to the Microsoft "extensions" and you would have a "superset" of Java that Sun would not be compatible with ...

> What I find most interesting about this is the failure once again
> of the Federal Courts to protect copyright. What they are saying is
> that MSFT can modify Sun's JAVA source code.

I believe it's more the extension that Sun was trying to prevent, and the judge seemed to think that this is ok. I big difference between contractual violation and copyright violation ...

Again, I'd have to reread to be sure ... but as I recall this was the big issue with Visual Studio and the Microsoft Java products ...

Scott C. Lemon
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext