SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (90110)1/27/2000 6:17:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) of 1572957
 
Jim - <So approx 10% on both processes or just .18u? Is it better on .13>

~5-10% for .18. Again, this is just a guess re: AMD, because I have no direct knowledge. My guess does not include Intel, because the point is moot. Design methodologies would also have a significant influence.

At .13 circuits will become increasingly RC influenced, as a ratio of RC delay vs. xtor capacitance, so one might say you need to go to Cu at .13, or risk one's MHz march coming to a grinding halt.

PB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News