SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks
NN 11.97+5.3%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (16733)1/29/2000 1:53:00 PM
From: larry pollock  Read Replies (2) of 18016
 
In a Ottawa Citizen Online article dated July 20, 1998 entitled "Newbridge at the crossroads, Industry consolidation makes high-tech firm a takeover target" is the following:

"A wild card in any takeover would be the reaction of Mr. Matthews. In a 1996 interview with the Citizen, the Newbridge chairman laid out what his response to a hostile takeover would be.

"I have sufficient worth," he said, "that I'd set a building up across the road and clean out all (Newbridge's) engineering staff. And I have the ability to do it. (The acquirers) would end up with a very nice set of glass and brick buildings."

"However, if Mr. Matthews senses that Newbridge's stand-alone position is weakening its ability to land key sales, he may be forced to reconsider his independence."
END OF QUOTE

It has been stated in more recent articles via Newbridge spokesmen that Matthews is open to options, etc. However, I don't know what Matthews' true thinking is, I know only what was cited in the article cited above.

Relative to the Wigglesworth statement that "Clearly we have shareholder value in mind," what do you think the reaction would have been if he said that Newbridge does not have shareholder value in mind?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext