SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 37.89-0.1%Nov 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Hull who wrote (97767)1/31/2000 5:13:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Thanks for the reply, and sorry for the delay -- I've been away.

Quick thoughts:

[trends/congruent = too general]
With the exception of Japan, the geographic growth rates are positively correlated for the eleven quarters provided. Besides, the worry isn't cyclical variation, but secular change.

[consumer/corporate]
It seems clear that corporate behavior has been a major factor in hardware underperformance, from Dell & Compaq to IBM. I welcome your input on expectations for consumer PC buying patterns.

[incremental error margin]
Errors arise from inexactness of accounting and reporting. I don't see how this applies to our necessarily inexact speculations.

[fundamentals less volatile]
I expect you're right; I also expect I'm right about pricing and capacity. I assume pricing is moved by marginal demand, so even a small, domestic shortfall would have an effect.

[Osha]
My first post was a devil's-advocate challenge. I'm glad you've taken the time to respond; I wonder whether the Socratic approach will be the only one I can expect from you.

Any news on Willamette? There have been a lot of teasing just-you-wait posts by close-to-Intel posters on this thread.

Cheers,

-mb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext