SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Starpoint Gold

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Fred C. Dobbs who wrote (2301)2/1/2000 9:48:00 PM
From: Bruce Morgan  Read Replies (1) of 2378
 
Hi Fred,

Old news regarding the lawsuit.

STARPOINT GOLDFIELDS INC.
2323C Dollarton Highway
North Vancouver, B.C. V7H 1B2 Canada
email: sts@Starpoint.com

Tel:
604-929-7182
Fax: 604-929-7152

* * * N E W S R E L E A S E - February 23, 1999 * * *

STS:VSE

On February 16, 1999, Chairman of Global Securities, Art Smolensky, released a statement
relating to Starpoint's counterclaim and the expert report supporting it by Shikaze Ralston,
Chartered Accountants, but denying one of the conclusions of that report, namely that Global
employed other VSE-member firms as jitneys to execute short sales on price downticks. Exchange
rules prohibit such sales.

Starpoint's experts stand by the conclusions of their report of Global's trading and
short-position records, obtained under Court order, namely that:

i. Global engaged in a pattern of trading and other actions and omissions
that were detrimental to Starpoint and its ability to raise capital

ii. Global, its associates, or its clients earned more than $200,000 from such
trading

iii. Global's pattern of trading and other actions and omissions appears
inconsistent with the rules and policies of the Vancouver Stock Exchange
(VSE) as well as with the B.C. Securities Act (BSCA).

The above report, provided from Global's own records (obtained by way of a Court order),
supports Starpoint's belief that Global had engaged in a pattern of trading activity which
attempted to both weaken Starpoint's position in the marketplace and to restrict Starpoint's
ability to complete the required financing.

The central conclusion of the report supports Starpoint's allegations as outlined in the
counterclaim.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
STARPOINT GOLDFIELDS INC.

I wouldn't hold my breath on this elephant versus the flea action but stranger things have happened. Has anyone heard anything about this case or will I be old and grey by the time it's resolved. Come to think of it I already am :)

Regards
Bruce
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext