SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 166.44+0.8%10:03 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: quidditch who wrote (6102)2/2/2000 12:02:00 PM
From: w molloy  Read Replies (1) of 13582
 
ASIC's vs DSP's

I had been under the impression that, in terms of transceiver functions of
MSMs and CSMs, an ASIC alone was capable of rendering the RF waveform into digital
bits translatable to analog form by a (incorporated or adjunct) DSP that might be part of the
core or not. Am I off base on this thought?


ASICS typically contain a microprocessor AND a DSP. The DSP is a number cruncher and handles functions that must take place in real time.

With Intel/DSP and TXN powerhouses in the DSP area, does this constitute a
manufacturer/carrier alternative to using Q's MSMs/CSMs?


Intel's Wireless Division (The former DSPc) will definitely compete
with the MSM. I don't know if they have plans to enter the basetation market.

TXN is more of a DSP core supplier (like ARMHY is for microprocessor cores). They are also developing added value (i.e bundled software) to their DSP's. Again, I'm not aware that they are developing a total system solution a la MSM/CSM.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext