SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB)
WMB 59.03+2.0%9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scott Moore who wrote (172)2/2/2000 4:13:00 PM
From: Bernard Levy   of 271
 
Hi Scott:

The only aspect that worries me about the disparity
would be the tax treatment of a possible WCG spinoff.
The NT stock spinoff of BCE was treated as taxable
for US investors. I guess the IRS views the NT stock
received as a ``dividend' taxable as ordinary
income at the face value of the NT stock. Of course,
since BCE will drop accordingly, this also creates
a long term capital loss which partially offsets this
income.

I am wondering if this is the only spinoff mechanism,
since from a tax viewpoint, it was a killer (the NT
spinoff by BCE was not taxable for Canadian investors--
only the US has such a murderous tax code). Key
benchmarks to look at would be: a) Conoco spinoff
by Dupont, b) upcoming spinoff of Palm by COMS.
For the Conoco case, I seem to remember that Dupont
shareholders were given the option of converting all
their Dupont shares in a corresponding number of
Conoco shares. Presumably, this did not ceate a taxable
event.

If any accountant is lurking around, we would be
all ears.

Best regards,

Bernard Levy

PS: The above discusson is moot for nontaxable
accounts (IRAs, 401ks...).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext