SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.860-0.7%10:13 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Valueman who wrote (3525)2/2/2000 4:59:00 PM
From: Gus  Read Replies (3) of 34857
 
You're repetitive and tiresome, Valueman. And Qualcomm itself is contradicting you on that score. The important distinctions that seem to escape you are that

a) QCOM's IPR position in CDMA2000 is not the same as its IPR position in WCDMA (ask them point-blank);

b) QCOM wants to charge the same flat patent-one, patent-all royalty rate regardless of (a).

Wanting hard and saying so are not going to make it so. Simple enough for you? If not, go read the Neopoint prospectus to get a better understanding of Philips "essential CDMA patents," the 5 CDMA patents cross-licensed by IDC and QCOM, and the CDMA patents cross-licensed by ERICY and QCOM.

Again, the best thing for you to do since you're heavily invested in QCOM is to call QCOM IR and try hard NOT to pick out only what you want to hear. Is that so hard to do?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News