Nokia (NOK) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)

NOK 6.845

-0.9%

3:57 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gus who wrote (3526)	2/2/2000 5:56:00 PM
From: Valueman	Read Replies (1) of 34857

Let me be repetitive once again. You say: b) QCOM wants to charge the same flat patent-one, patent-all royalty rate regardless of (a) Not only do they WANT to, but they HAVE successfully done that. ERICY is a fine example of a company that will pay the same rate for W-CDMA as for today's CDMA. Philips, whom you cite as a holder of essential CDMA patents, has also signed a W-CDMA license with Qualcomm. Lucent has as well. Now why would they do that Gus? Qualcomm does not contradict me at all. My apologies to the Nokia board, but this man is spreading FUD at an amazing rate. I have made my point--this is the last you'll hear from me.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next