SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (73770)2/3/2000 1:01:00 AM
From: wonk  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
Sigh!

There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.

1. In these 8 years, the President's proposed budget increased every year - a compounded annual growth rate of 6.7% (1094/ (1+.067)^7).

2. The President never proposed a balanced budget.

3. The President's smallest proposed deficit was larger the Carter's smallest actual deficit.

4. These analyses invariably ignore the effects of entitlements which amount to approximately 50% of the budget. Neither Reagan nor the Congress were willing to expend the political capital to tackle entitlements. If one re-examines the Reagan budgets eliminating entitlements, Congress spent less than the President requested on non-entitlements.

5. Even considering entitlements, the national debt grew by 2.25 trillion dollars. Since the variance, including entitlements of Congressional overspending was $554 billion shall we then lay approximately the $1.7 trillion of additional national debt at Reagan's feet?

6. So there you have it. On average, Congress spent 2.8% more than Reagan asked for, while the cumulative (yearly compounding rate) was a whopping 24.5% more. If the budget in 1989 had been 24.5% smaller (i.e., 280 billion dollars) there could have been a surplus of about 130 billion dollars instead of a deficit. This is equivalent to a constant compounding increase of 2.8% every year during the 8 budgets above and beyond the previous year's spending....

A gently as possible, your math is flawed. Using the starting point of Reagan's first budget of $695 billion and an end point of the 1989 appropriated funds results in a compounded annual growth rate of 7.4% (1144/(1+.074)^7). 7.4% - 6.7% results in a variance of only 0.7% between the Reagan proposed budgets and the actual Congressional allocation, including entitlements.

ww

p.s. 0.7% variance between a proposed budget an actual expenditures would probably rank in the upper echelons of Corporate American performance.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext