How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (247)	4/26/1997 8:28:00 PM
From: Iceberg	of 1894

>The present protocol then, for the "standard" Type II is sufficient. This new possibility would constitute a subdivision of the category Bill, I'll have to agree that Gottfried's possibility would constitute a definite new category of some type--although not necessarily a subcategory. It might even be a category/subcategory, or whatever, beyond the expertise of the typical SI poster to identify, or deal with. In any case, do you think the existing type II response protocol is sufficient for a poster who is suspected of having a psychiatric problem? Does the type II protocol still apply in such situations? >Ugh, I certainly don't feel comfortable about the labelling process. Remember, Bill, that the labeling process on this thread is designed to facilitate discussions; not to actually pin precise labels on individuals in the sense of making a medical diagnosis. >thought I saw a psychiatrist/psychologist somewhere. We could use some input from that person now. Having a psychiatrist/psychologist participate on this thread would be a definite help. Let's keep on the lookout for one, and offer a special personal invitation if one is found. Thanks, Ice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next