SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs
SPY 674.96+0.9%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: j g cordes who wrote (25059)2/3/2000 9:06:00 PM
From: Johnny Canuck  Read Replies (2) of 68284
 
To: Valueman who wrote (3530)
From: Mr.Fun
Wednesday, Feb 2, 2000 9:53 PM ET
Reply # of 3556

Comments:

1. Call Ericsson IR and ask them if they expect to pay QCOM royalties for ever. The answer I got was that for the
time being it was expedient, but that they believe there are several paths to implementing W-CDMA, some of
which would require NO payment to QCOM and that they will explore all avenues.

2. Ask Nokia if they will need to pay QCOM royalties for W-CDMA. They will emphatically say no.

3. Ask QCOM how much Lucent and Motorola have to pay for their infrastructure licenses for both CDMA-One
and CDMA2000 - the answer is zero, they are royalty free.

4. That said many companies will pay royalties because they haven't the technical resources to bypass QCOM.
Many will buy QCOM chipsets IF they continue to develop good designs and sell them for a fair price.

5. QCOM is not the universal solvent, perpetual motion, or the fountain of youth. It is a company that will have to
compete very hard and very successfully to prove itself worth what you would pay for it if you bought it today.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext