SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SYQUEST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeff Goodman who wrote (2536)4/26/1997 11:11:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich   of 7685
 
<<I can't imagine this being anything but good news for SYQT.>>

That's a very fast jump to conclusion...

1. <noted by Iomega support (although this has not been confirmed officially)> Huge ambiguity! It's noted by Iomega but not confirmed? So have we heard Iomega's side or not? Huh?

2. <I use jaz drives all the time...4 or 5 Jaz drives fail (in one way or another) of the 10 or 11 drives that I've used...> So this consultant continues to use a product that gives him a 40% to 50% failure rate? Would you? I don't buy it -- the word 'prank' comes to mind.

I'm not an engineer (I don't even play one on TV)...but wouldn't this type of flaw would seem like an inherent design issue rather than an isolated incident such as the recent cartridge recall? I mean, it's not a component that's failing, mag fields are a prevailing condition. So nobody has noticed until now?

My monitor sits directly on top of my CPU and the internally mounted Jaz has not had a problem in the 4 months I've owned it. The external Jaz drives at our office are within inches of our 21" monitors -- not a single problem since first day of use (8 months ago).

Let's wait and see what IOM has to say. Their record has been good about acknowledging the problem cartridges...no reason to suspect they would deceive on this issue. I think it will be quickly quashed as nothing more than a crank phone call.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext