SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Riverlightning who wrote (2186)2/4/2000 11:30:00 PM
From: Carl R.  Read Replies (1) of 5582
 
OK, so you say Hank doesn't carry on conversations, and he just rants? Let's take a look at some of your posts to see how much you have contributed to the discussion of the pros and cons of an investment in GUMM over the last several months. Here is a good sample of your contributions to the thread:

Hank is an unrepentant jerk attempting to manipulate
Message 12784216

Hank, you are "scum on a stick"
Message 12768139

the thimble sized warped mind of a inveterate self-aggrandizing habitual liar
Message 12382671

Mike, delete that last comma in your message #1870 (referring to a post about "water over the dam, Hank)
Message 12257062

the dimwitted dolt Hank self aggrandizing blowhard
Message 11829251

tell these mealy mouthed egg sucking, low life, perverted, slimebag, stench-riden, incorrigible liars and sons of traveling snake salesmen to stick it where the sun don't shine
Message 11803970

And what is it YOU have Hank? Other than an ongoing propensity of making a fool of yourself
Message 11787532

In the time that I have been reading and posting on the thread Hank has made several good points, most recently about the fact that a sample size of 100 that was not geographically distributed could reach invalid conclusions, and I would have to agree with his interpretation of statistics. On the other hand, your posts look like a bunch of rants to me. I do agree that you have the right to rant if you choose, so feel free. Before I read the body of work you have contributed here I was under the impression that you simply had a momentary loss of control. I apologize for mistaking you for a valuable contributor.

Let me add that after having success treating 3 colds with Zicam, I have one now that is not responding to Zicam treatment at all, unfortunately. I presume it is a non-rhinovirus type that attacks in some way other than the ICAM receptor. It began as a sore throat, and is now in my sinuses and if it follows my wife's pattern, will head for the lungs next. The fact that not all colds are amenable to treatment by Zicam is not surprising given the fact that not of the various cold viruses attack in the same way. Still 3 out of 4 isn't bad.

Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext