SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (91631)2/5/2000 12:27:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) of 1578116
 
TWY - <What cache story is this??? TIA>

The story circulating on the web that the K6III is dead due to unacceptable sub threshold leakage. From JC's:

00/02/04, 12:29am - Hey, one last thing that I got from that mysterious but groovy fellow. This might interest lots of you guys, as the issue has been hostly debated here and there recently. According to this person ... There will "probably" never be a K6-3+. The K6-3's initial plight was caused by "severe current leakage problems" caused by the cache's extra transistors, and while there is a 180nm K6-3 mask set in Austin, the smaller Sharptooths are still displaying the leakage problems.
Basically, if you turn off half the cache, the leakage is not as bad and the processor works better.
K6-3+ was originally planned to sell alongside the K6-2+. However, at a very recent internal AMD meeting, a roadmap showed no K6-3. Of course, that contradicts the most recent publicly displayed roadmap, so I'll leave it to you to decide the story for yourself. Personally, I'm inclined to believe this side of it, as this is info from the inside, eh?


Just unsubstantiated rumor.

PB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext