SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Big Dog who wrote (4275)2/6/2000 3:30:00 AM
From: TTOSBT  Read Replies (2) of 5102
 
Re: "No. The write-off was associated with the Visigenic merger:"

Darrell thanks for link. I guess where I'm getting confused (and likewise feel other's can be) is in every area where they state "write-offs" they mention vaguely cost of "fixed assets or cost" I.E. in the March 31, 1999 Annual 10Q they stated under the heading "Gross Margins" the following: "This also resulted in certain fixed costs being spread across lower revenues, as well as by charges related to the write-off of excess inventory."

Then just a bit further down from there under the heading "Restructuring, Merger and Other Non-Recurring Charges" there's another mentions: " $3.2 million to termination of certain lease agreements and the write-off of certain fixed assets"</b?

Then just below that again: " write-offs of certain assets and professional fees."

As you can see it can be confusing as to what those fixed asset costs are for?

Also those forward looking statements are still terrible but I guess that's for legal reasons?

TTOSBT

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext