SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Process Boy who wrote (91730)2/6/2000 1:34:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) of 1574996
 
PB,

<Are you saying P860 is only Cu on the top two interconnect layers?>

I KNOW that test runs taped out of Arizona in Q4 were limited to Cu on the top layers. The idea was supposed to have been risk mitigation.

I have posted about this a while back and I don't remembering you questioning this at that time. So, either you didn't catch it before (would be surprising given you tend to jump on process issues right away) or something has changed and you are pulling a PB. Which one is it?

<Now I know you sources have no clue on the process side.>

With all the clues that you have and they don't, my sources have called the CuMine ramp and 800MHz better than you did! I will stick with the, thank you. I probably just need an update.

Chuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News