[Personal opinions re posters:]
Eric --
I'm glad I'm not the only one impatient with inconsistency. Just for the record, I'll tell you what I've concluded after posting here since last August:
WillC = CA, engineer, et al. Knowledgeable, claims objectivity yet utilizes Elmer Gantry-type tactics to negate Amati. Gains unusual pleasure from twisting debates to play with other's minds/emotions. It's a game and he can play any side to his advantage. (You're good, Will, very, very good.)
robt justine/justine robt/Jerry Stringer. Guilty of impersonating me on the Chat thread twice. Was evicted and has since returned. Where Will's redeeming grace is sector knowledge, this person has none.
Jim Miller. Was semi-active on the AOL Amati board, though I don't follow any more. Sends mail similar to Cddly and Sage's. He's not twisted, only bleeding profusely and needing someone else to blame but himself. Manly is not a term that comes to mind.
Amadeo Zevi -- Is he/she one person or several? I don't know. Is he/she working independently or hired by a competitor? Don't know this either. Is he/she a misogynist? Possibly, though that would be too easy. I believe his/her vendetta stems from the days when Techie was posting and there may be some connection. If I were to pursue this person for harrassment, that's where I'd start.
I don't post any of these comments lightly. As a researcher, I pay close attention to syntax, choice of words, and other internal clues.
My biases are well known: I'm an optimist, I'm long, and I'm a fanatic when it comes to using words carefully. My biggest failing has been in believing the partnership clues were more imminent than they've been. When you travel you should take half the clothes you'll need and twice the money. With clues, halve the power of the source and double the time frame. (With the partnerships, USRX fell through and the other is still going strong, but has become far more complex.)
Now, for those who like hints---and this will exclude alot of you --- I believe my summer solstice will come early, but I've been wrong before, so take it for what it's worth.
Cheers!
Pat
|
