Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (92046)	2/8/2000 11:20:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) of 1574524

SCumbria - <What does the age of the core have to do with it? His remarks indicate that PIII would run faster if it had copper.> Because SCUMBRIA, he also said: ""There is no performance compromise for using proven Aluminum (sic) interconnect". He also talks about it "being easier". I'm assuming "it" is the design process. I guarantee you Cu on Coppermine and P858 would not have been easier for Intel from a manufacturing standpoint, for a multitude of reasons. I knew I'd hear from you on this one. Mr. Green is a designer. That's cool. I like designers. But I bet if you talked to a PROCESS person from Intel, about how much benefit Cu is at .18, you'd get a very succinct answer. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next