Julius, your not looking at the facts and you do not use logic in coming to your answers.
1. if the gold was made up of highly disseminated grains, then how can you get a accuarate sample from 750grams. This is the whole point. A larger sample would be the most accurate, that is why sending the whole core and letting the assayer crush it like brex did, but at the lab would be the best confirmation. See, you do not see this major point of contention. The brex proponents do not have a valid answer for this. Brex is using slay of the hand tricks here. They did not split cores because they would lose gold as the result, but crushing the cores and sending 750grams would be ok. Come on. one independent lab said that in order to get an accurate reading based on brex's definition of the gold would take 500tons of material. but brex comes up with 750grams that they crush and send to the assayer. This is a good foundation to build a house of cards that is now crumbling.
2. Normet did not deny this was placer gold, they did not come to an opinion.
3. Felderhoff is Dutch, not canadian.
4. why do you keep drilling, isn't 30mm ounces enough to start infill drilling? Do feasibility on it, then drill reserves as you bring the mne into play. Why keep drilling to prove up more and more, when no cash is coming in?
5. That's right, why didn't pdg and abx back up brex. these are facts to date. no one confirmed independent results matching brex yet. facts.
6. your logic is good to a point, but statistics tell you that gold would have to appear sooner or later. why not, if 20 slices were analyzed no gold was reported. gee did the gold fall out of the middle?
7. fcx did fire and cyanide assaying, they reported gold. minute amounts. these are facts.
8. fcx's results were not inconclusive, you say that.
Wait till the end of the week for more facts. Take off your rose color glasses, gather the facts, analyze them, come to a conclusion based on those existing facts. not on convoluted theories.
clif |
