SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (46627)2/9/2000 4:11:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) of 71178
 
It is a grave mistake to mess up physics with mathematics, and Nick is right to try to learn electronics without confusing the issue with mathematics. I've known several Nobel laureates in physics and their greatest achievements were experimental. Einstein, of course, had to go to work in the Swiss patent office, and he always said that examining patents was where he really learned physics. He was not great in math. Bardeen always said that true physics was gadgetry, although his major contributions were theoretical (2 Nobel (shared) prizes -- the transistor effect and a (incorrect) theory of superconductivity.
During the 1970's when various accelerators were being shut down, a friend at UI got his refunded. The Asst Dir of NSF explained it to me -- "he made his graduate students do all the electrical work" and "he soldered incredibly fast." By all means encourage Nick to learn every thing he can about being an electronics technician. He will learn the math he needs in due time. James Watt was a lab artificer (technician) at the University of Edinburgh. No one remembers the names of the natural scientists he worked for. Faraday and Franklin never went to college.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext