SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
IDCC 348.69+0.8%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gus who wrote (3796)2/9/2000 7:05:00 PM
From: w molloy  Read Replies (1) of 5195
 
GUS SAID - And if you drill down at least 3 levels from any of the 5 patents covered by the
IDC-QCOM cross-licensing agreeement,
you will find more sophisticated spread spectrum system and component patents from
various companies dating back to the sixties.

W SAID- ....would equally apply to IDC would it not?

GUS SAID- Exactly. Nokia is also a major proponent of the 3g Patent Platform.

====================================================================
Gus - let me post your original post again - you seem to have forgotten it.

Message 12813679
provoked by Qualcommers who can not tolerate the notion that CMDA rests on the
foundation of spread spectrum technology that has been around since the 1940s
and
1950s -- public domain foundations, in other words -- because then that would
mean
that there are alternative paths that cast serious doubts about QCOM's ability to
impose its royalty regime on the rest of the industry while it only has 10% of the
global market.


Question 1.
You assert that prior art casts serious doubts on QCOM royalties.
Why do you think serious doubts wouldn't equally apply to IDC?

Question 2.
You assert that QCOMS royalties come from 10% of the global market. Others on this thread assert that IDC gas 12% of the remaining 90%.

Comparing IDC and QCOM royalty figures

IDC : for the three month period ended
September 30, 1999 includes $3.4 million in new licenses, $4.0 million related
to development efforts for Nokia and Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd.
("Samsung"), and $2.9 million in recurring royalties.


QCOM : revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2000 were $178 million

how do you account for the disparity?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext