Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (92233)	2/9/2000 8:11:00 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) of 1574005

Elmer Re.. <<<<I always get a good laugh out of this line of reasoning. You think Intel is somehow obligated to provide AMD with a compiler to make the Athlon look good!! What a laugh!!! Is Intel also obligated to provide a better chipset too? Should Intel provide poor AMD with the best possible BIOS? Let AMD make their own damn compiler. This argument is pathetic. >>> Elmer, the point is, why would we on the AMD board care about Intel compilers made for Intel chips run on Intel computers. This is wonderful information for a Intel board. What has it got to do with AMD. Nothing, unless Intel makes the compilers public; as they are supposed to do; and the specs can be compared on different cpus. What confirmation do we have for any of these scores. None. We all know that certain benchmarks can be made to show off the strengths of any computer. You seem to think most AMD board members don't know this. As far as "is Intel obligated to supply AMD with a compiler to make AMD look good." How could that possibly happen unless Athlon really does beat PIII? Your question implies that AMD will look good by comparison. If PIII is as good as you say what are you worried about. Chicken to compare eh Elmer?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next