Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Quickdraw who wrote (12613)	2/10/2000 10:59:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) of 14627

<<But I think you are doing a disservice to yourself and the respect people have for your analytical skills when you get into the type of, let's call it "leading" commentary you have with charred. >> Don't think so. And there was certainly nothing planned here. What can I say if both Charred and I think that PFG is overvalued (for now) when it gets near $5. You know QD, there are a lot of people who read these threads. Some are in love with the stock others have to decided if they will buy the stock or not. When I post on a thread I post with that in mind. I am also "in love" with a few stocks and I post on their threads. But I always welcome posters who will bring me back to earth. If you read all my posts, you will agree that I have been generally positive on PacRIm. But I feel that it is ahead of itself near $5, and this is due only to the promotional strenghts of the group. And this means that buyers at this level must be prudent. I brought in a few comparisons just to make my point and to inform. Now you may not agree with me and that is fine. So maybe we should debate this point instead.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next