JY: I guess you could say that's because he's long since proven(via +2 years), and in a remarkable consistent fashion I might add, an inability to do much other than insult. At least Larry, and other naysayers, stay "on topic"(mostly, heh). So, when he DOES attempt some kind of cogent commentary, he's automatically discounted. After all, other threadsters reactions kind'a come with the terrain of him having insulted damn near everyone, both long AND short, at one time or another on this thread, no? Bottom line? He has only, by his direct actions, himself to blame for others reaction to him at this point. So it goes...
As for his comment.....well, they can best be address by one, simple statement. And you need consider I would never have even SEEN his post without your comment, as I've long ago turned his SI ID off(I suspect most others have, too). What is pointed out is a mere start to the long process of moving from R&D to commercial fruition. And of course all starts begin small. I consider two p.o.'s small. Significant, but small. Let's see how the future goes, eh? One we may just get an inkling of at the SH meeting.
Regards!
John~ |
