SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : General Lithography
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (1151)2/10/2000 7:53:00 PM
From: Bilberry  Read Replies (1) of 1305
 
Robgera, you have posted some interesting posts. I have been told that the one factor keeping x-ray from being big is that you need a huge synchrotron to run these things. Aside from taking up a room, they are expensive, give off dangerous radiation, and require a staff to run.

My question is, if a company developed an inexpensive point source x-ray (using lasers), would this change the debate about x-ray? The reason I ask that question is that I have been following the progress of a small San Diego company called JMAR Technologies (JMAR) that has been developing such a device (A table top synchrotron). Please give me your opinion of this device:

Here is a link to a CNN article about it: cnn.com

Here is a master link list for JMAR: ragingbull.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News