Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: charred who wrote (12626)	2/11/2000 8:49:00 AM
From: Nexus	Read Replies (3) of 14627

Charred, Yuor approach to investing seems a little too simplistic to be very effective. Let's say for example that two companies have assets that are considered to be of similar value: - If company A is run by a CEO that has been known to defraud investors (like Bre-X) and the other, B, is run by proven minefinders that have done well for their shareholders in the past, don't you think that B should have a larger market cap. - If both properties contain the same number of ounces but A is a closed off system while B remains open in all directions, don't you think that B should have a larger market cap. - If the volume in the shares of stock A remains the same throughout exploration while the volume in B rises considerably showing interest by large investor's, don't you think that B should have a larger market cap. I could go on and on but if you have been successful investing that way, more power to you. One piece of advice though. When stocks are considered undervalued, it probably means that they deserve to be valued that way. Good luck, Nexus.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next