Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (12615)	2/11/2000 11:50:00 AM
From: Quickdraw	Read Replies (2) of 14627

Claude, I think the PFG thread is one of the most well informed of the mining threads on SI, and I believe it to be well balanced. When I said this comment " you continue to post comparative stocks to the PFG thread ... as you have done before. I really don't have a problem with this as I think Francisco Gold is way undervalued as is and it does give us a reality check." I meant it. I don't mind doing this type of comparison and I think it is a good thing. As my personal profile reveals I am now invested in SWG which is another company you brought forward to our attention on this thread and after some investigation I bought in. Member 2222523 Where I begin to get irked is when you give the impression that you and charred are the only ones on this thread who can provide a reality check. I truly respect your analytical skills but I am concerned when you post to someone who clearly has a negative slant as if he were some sort of expert. I believe his "crash and burn" post at Message 11271490 followed by the continual "NSR Bad deal" type of posting he has done as this stock has climbed from the $1.50 range to the $5+ range may in fact have kept some people on the sidelines, people who could now have sold half on a double. techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com Thus when the "Johnny and Ed Show" began it appeared we were in for another "NSR bad deal" lesson. Message 12822800 techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com Claude, I believe a number of posters, including Nexus, and myself attempt to be as objective and as well informed as possible in our posts on this thread and I invite you to revisit my personal profile to check this out. We don't sit back and say "To the moon Alice!!" but instead are amazed the share price has reached these levels well in advance of drilling. Additionally, with regard to balance, responses like this to mjenson techstocks.com clearly display that I have learned a little over my years of investing (thanks bearcatbob) and hope to share these lessons with others who read the thread. My thoughts regarding this stock perhaps can best be described by a post I made at the Canadian Hot Stock Club Message 12769181 I believe you gave a fair representation of PFG at the Gold and Silver Mining thread Message 12758920 This is a high risk stock, lets make this perfectly clear and anyone betting on it should not be risking the farm. My philosophy in this case would be don't invest anything more than you can afford to lose … but each of us must make our own decisions. Good investing, Qd

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next