SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (17767)2/12/2000 8:47:00 AM
From: StockHawk  Read Replies (1) of 54805
 
RE: S&P 500 and Lindy's Russian Army

Bill, the information below is taken from the Standard & Poor's web site, in a section discussing the S&P 500. They are answering the question of why the index is hard to beat (by mutual funds) and their answer sounds like your Russian Army approach:

Why is the S&P 500 so Hard to Beat?

In a search of Standard & Poor's mutual fund data, only 14 diversified equity funds beat the index's annual return of 22.98% for the five years ending with November, 1998.


Momentum effects. One of the adages of Wall Street is to cut your losses and let your profits run. If you could constantly rebalance your portfolio so that more of your money was in the winning stocks and less was in the losers, your portfolio would ride momentum higher and higher. Because the S&P 500 is capitalization-weighted that is exactly what happens. The index holds each stock in proportion to its total value, or market "capitalization," in the stock market.

Therefore, if a stock surges in price, its market capitalization rises and its share in the S&P 500 climbs. Likewise, if a stock tumbles, its market value and its weight in the index both decline.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext