Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (92848)	2/13/2000 12:53:00 AM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) of 1574685

Re: "During the last few months AMD has delivered beyond their promises. In contrast, Intel has fallen quite short. Gateway and Dell have made no secret of this." And you believe Intel hasn't resolved their capacity problems and no further speed work has been done, right? Good, we are in sync. There is no reason whatsoever to think that Intel's process should ever produce anything faster than the first early production units from a brand new process. Even though their previous process yielded a nearly 2X improvement from first production to mature product, we should still see the same limits at around 800MHz that we have seen on early CuMine production. Right? No amount of speed path work is going to change that. Right? No process improvements will help what's basically an architecture limitation. Right? Obviously Intel won't get above their current speed. It's an architecture thing. It just wasn't built for speed so there's no way they can pull this off. Right? Pipelines too short. Right? I mean Intel is going to continue screwing up for ever. Right? So, like I said. You and I are in agreement so don't pay any attention to those lies. EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next