SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AT&T
T 25.79+0.5%3:23 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tony A. Matthews who wrote (3270)2/13/2000 12:37:00 PM
From: Peter Mokhiber  Read Replies (1) of 4298
 
A little history may help.
T traded at 53ish on the strike date 9-9 of LU and NCR distribution, and 38ish after on the date 9-22 the distribution. If you had sold T after the strike date and bought back after the distribution date you would have owned LU, NCR and made a 28% return on your T.

Now onto the Wireless distribution, should be about 1 share for each 10 T(a guess, Wireless revenues are about 10% total T revenue, with assets about 11%[22/197]) T has grown at 16% this year including Wireless. Wireless is growing at about 33%(I would like confirmation of my numbers) contributing contributing significantly to overall T growth.

The questions to be answered, how fast will T grow without Wireless? What will the market think of that growth rate?
Will the market lend a premium to Wireless growth rates and discount the base T growth rates?

If so Wireless may be a better hold/buy and T alone may not have the growth capabilities in the remaining components. Maybe the decision is to hold T until the strike date, sell the next day and buy all Wireless after the IPO. Remembering after the IPO LU could be bought for 32 and has split 2 since then. So even a 50-55 LU having held LU your cost basis would be approx. $8.

Any comments would be welcome
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext