SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 244.25-2.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Harmond who wrote (93464)2/13/2000 9:47:00 PM
From: Eric Wells  Read Replies (1) of 164684
 
That's rediculous.

William - thanks for your comments.

"Ridiculous" means NOTHING! As I mentioned in my post, Amazon announced a strategic alliance with Drugstore.com in Feb of '99. And now we have another strategic alliance that is going to cost Drugstore.com $105 million. I find it interesting - not ridiculous - especially since the deal can be interpreted as a balance sheet transfer.

"Currently" means NOTHING!

Ah, this must be the mantra of the new economy. And current lack of profitability means nothing either - as long as we keep repeating this to ourselves, everything will be okay. Certainly the current state of a company's business as well as the current state of the competition bears some relevance. You've offered no insight into why Amazon invested in Greenlight over other online car companies. Do you have any knowledge of why Amazon chose Greenlight?

That is not the case at all.

Yes, Amazon just raised more cash. But I wrote that there were two potential reasons for Amazon's recent deals: raising cash and generating low-cost revenues. At Amazon's current burn rate, the cash just raised through the debt offering will only last them 9-12 months. To say Amazon doesn't need cash - now or 9-12 months from now - well, to say such a thing would be a bit ridiculous wouldn't it?

Thanks,
-Eric
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext