SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Earlie who wrote (75920)2/15/2000 12:05:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
..but bet on public appearances for as long as three more years. According to an amendment to their license (see Rambus's '98 10-K, edgar.sec.gov; "..(a) Intel will use its continuing best efforts in marketing, public relations, and engineering to make the Rambus-D DRAM the primary DRAM for PC main memory applications through December 31, 2002; and (b) Intel will communicate to the top (10) DRAM manufacturers, Intel's intention to support the Rambus-D Interface Technology in its integrated circuits for low end workstation, performance desktop, and basic PC platforms." Note, mind you, the conspicuous absence of servers in that clause. The contradiction between DDR-in-servers and RDRAM-in-PCs starts to make sense. Expect also continued RDRAM support in chipsets. If you look at Rambus's most recent 10-K (http://edgar.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/917273/0001012870-99-004768.txt) you find the following language about Intel's RMBS warrants:
"..granted a warrant to Intel Corporation for the purchase of 1,000,000
shares of Rambus common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share.
The warrant will become exercisable only upon the achievement of certain
milestones by Intel relating to shipment volumes of Rambus-based chipsets."
I expect Intel execs still believe they can ram (cough) RDRAM down the markets throat. But if they can't, you know they're not about to leave $100,000,000 lying on the table -- especially since all they need to do is make chipsets to get it. Check the options contracts for Geoff Tate and David Mooring; both have a clause to the effect that,
"..Common Stock Equivalents shall vest on the date, if any, that the
Company determines that more than 20% of the main memory chipsets
shipped by Intel Corporation in each of two (2) consecutive calendar
quarters implement certain Company interface specifications.."
I'd bet all Intel needs to do to get its $100 million is, one, ship enough Rambus-enabled chipsets (which, IMO, they are well on their way to doing), and two, issue enough positive spin to prop up RMBS stock until they sell out (unless they already hedged their exposure -- -g-). Again, this clears up the otherwise odd strategy of shipping "mixed" chipsets. See Gelsinger at IDF, theregister.co.uk
"We'll ship multi millions of i820 in the next quarter, and
some of these will be in two + two configurations, mixing
synchronous memory and Rambus memory."
Translation: we're getting our money if we have to ship silicon that never gets used. The whole soap opera is entertaining; I'm sure glad I'm not a corporate IT buyer right now, though. -mb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext