SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Harold S. who wrote (60458)2/16/2000 11:00:00 PM
From: Think4Yourself  Read Replies (2) of 95453
 
The poster is wrong about both power and the cars (typical for Shell). As most of us know, power generation is going to NG at a dramatic pace, completely changing the NG supply demand picture in the process. It's going FROM COAL, not oil, so the argument of the poster is wrong. Anyone burning oil for power generation would be losing their shirt. MAYBE the poster means overseas, but the US is the #1 consumer

Fuel cell cars will need a major distribution network in order to be accepted by society. The first commercial generation of fuel cell cars will almost certainly run on gasoline. This type of fuel cell is available now (I read about it last summer). It's great because there are virtually no emissions. Of course elimination of the sulpher from gasoline will allow the automakers to accomplish virtually the same thing with current technology. The sulpher will almost certainly have to be removed either way.

Would YOU buy an expensive new car not knowing if you could refuel it on vacation? Not me!

Shell has made a lot of assinine statements in the past year but this is by far the dumbest.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext