Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Process Boy who wrote (93689)	2/17/2000 1:12:00 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) of 1572145

Anyway, regarding your question, I trust Haim Baird, who posted that it was indeed a Willamette system running PPT, would certainly be in a position to know this. PB, I was the one who originally posed the question to Elmer and my question never questioned whether it was a Willamette or not. I am pretty honest so I believe it when Intel says it was a Willamette. What I questioned was whether it was running at 1500 GHz, or at a much lesser rate. I firmly believe given the Willamette's immaturity and the probability of its crashing, they would not risk running at the higher speed for 2 hours! ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next