SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Process Boy who wrote (93780)2/17/2000 5:59:00 AM
From: Goutam  Read Replies (3) of 1575767
 
PB, re: The .18 xtors won't run at 3GHz thing. I was skeptical on this myself. Now he is claiming that he meant control logic only.

I make it a point to read all Scrumbia's posts and pay attention to whenever he discusses matters related to Processor architecture. He did mention about the control logic - it's you that missed it - because you are not a CPU architecture guy to grasp the whole picture from Scrumbia's posts unless its explained to you. Also, read Scrumbia's posts again and don't leave the subtle qualifiers or technical terms in his comments - especially pay attention where he says ".18 xtors won't run at 3GHz ...." ( "..." indicates few important words you left out from Scrumbia's post - for you the left out part may not look significant or important, but its essential to understand what Scrumbia is trying to elicit)

Pretty sloppy research if this is true, as everyone and their brother has been saying ALU for 36 hours.

It's my recollection that Scrumbia was the first one expressed that if there is any thing running at 3GHz on Willamette chip, then it might be just a tiny circuit on the chip running at 3GHz. The ALU details on this board appeared later in response to his posts.

Regards,
Goutama
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext