Doesn't it bother you, just a little, that your company's "full time" CEO is also, well, the "full time" CEO of another company at the same time, in effect working two "full time" jobs?
Don't you feel a little better/more secure investing in a company where your CEO is really full time, dedicating 200% of his/her every waking moment efforts to the customers, employees and shareholders? Say vs. investing in a company where your CEO is "part time" and is only dedicating 50% of his/her efforts between two different company's customers, employees and shareholder interests?
What would happen, for instance, if the CEO working two jobs at two different firms simultaneously with two different sets of customers, employees and shareholders had, say for example, a conflict between these two bases of customers, employees and shareholders?
I would never invest in a company where the CEO wasn't 200% dedicated to serving customers, employees and shareholders of the company with his/her every waking moment.
Geoff Goodfellow |
