Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (93842)	2/17/2000 1:26:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) of 1580265

Jim, <That's right...you, PB and Elmer should have kept your traps shut rather than denying it...> I can't speak for PB or Elmer, but as soon as I figured that Kap knew more than he should have, I stopped responding. That's the problem with guys who misuse "inside info" like Kap or Chuck. They talk about something that should not be known to the public, and then they come up with the wrong conclusions and get you AMDroids all worked up. Meanwhile, I can't rebut those arguments, since it would mean confirming ill-gotten info. Whatever it is, you guys can't honestly say that you assumed the best from the split-frequency core instead of the worst. Instead of Intel demonstrating a 0.75/1.5 GHz core, they instead demonstrated a 1.5/3.0 GHz core. Perhaps you guys should chide Kap for making you believe the worst. He was obviously using his inside information to legitimize his bogus estimates, and you fell for it. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next