SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CheckFree Holdings Corp. (CKFR), the next Dell, Intel?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Max Singer who wrote (13866)2/17/2000 3:48:00 PM
From: TLindt  Read Replies (1) of 20297
 
Part of the Problem was the e-billings comming from AEP were not "true to life" statement with all the actual details like payments included within. They were not "mexorex"....."Is it live or is it memorex?"

They weren't truely exact archival records. For instance I sent 104 weekly payments on 2 e-bills....the e-bills showed a record of 24 payments at the end of a year. One each month on each e-bill. So I cut the service off.

Got my first series of paper billings yesterday. They had a payment on it for every week on each paper bill.

Going over this once with Customer service at AEP, they said we have no record of my e-bill on their system. They didn't have the benefit of any e-bill details...none. ie..it was on the interNut and not on their system.

I was just upset that neither one of us, while I participated in e-bill had any idea what was going on transactionally.

ie...even though I knew what I was doing....nobody could see it anywhere...the details.

So that one...failed the memorex test, and disconnects the customer from the benefit of customer service. Because they don't have a clue.

Back to archiving those e-bills? No sense to it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext