Pat, Re: "If you'd argued they were hoping to become a de facto standard, you'd have been more creditable."
Terayon recognizes that DOCSIS inclusion is very important, IMO. That they might be ultimately be able to successfully become a de-facto standard was exactly my gist. I'm not surprised you pretend not to have noticed.
Re: "You must amaze yourself"
No, but you do amaze me.
Re: "Let's try this one more time: if Terayon's earnings were estimated to be minus .19 based on their S-CDMA sales, AND their Imedia sales allowed them to come in at a plus .04, how do you explain the gains if you change your story and deny that Imedia saved the day and brought in the good numbers?"
Get your logic teacher, re-read my original post, and realize I never ever said that Imedia sales allowed them to come in at a pro forma plus .04- save in the illogical extrapolations of your mind. Also, in offering that I didn't know for sure if Imedia helped earnings, I did NOT deny in any shape or form that Imedia saved the day- as you incorrectly and disgustingly(at this point) suggest above. You are quite absurd here...attributing to me words and meanings all reasonable people can plainly see I never offered, in both instances.
I'm not particularly interested in what products brought profits to plus .04. I'd rather know if S-CDMA has an advantage which the competition can't match..and just how valuable that advantage might be.
Dan B |
