Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sosmartinov who wrote (84044)	2/23/2000 8:51:00 AM
From: jaytee	Read Replies (4) of 120523

ANYONE (any of the Gemmers) kind enough to PLEASE help? I'm a long-time lurker/member. Is anyone here HAPPY WITH THE BROKERAGE they're at? I'm about to BAIL on a bad situation . . . and am hoping to learn from your experiences , at least, as to who to avoid. 1) Is anyone using A.B WATLEY or ANY OTHER brokerage and 2)using it for BULLETIN BOARD STOCKS as well? 3) and are HAPPY with: a) speed and quality of fills b) confirmation? 4) is the CONTROL of your order making a "better fill" a reality? and WORTH the added cost? 5) I don't necessarily want the cheapest commission. I'm interested in getting the best VALUE (best fill) 6) I'm looking for a broker that is reasonable for doing options as well? (I read somewhere Watley's, for example> options are priced "high" . True? Any help GREATLY appreciated! I'm trying to switch an account to a broker that won't make me LIQUIDATE some bulletin boards in my overall portfolio. I'd like to DUMP this "junk food " part of my poftfolio . . . but NOT now, at a loss! Thus , the need for a brokerage with quick executions. . . and an availability to transfer/trade BULLETIN BOARDS at this time. Then, I can use the new broker to use (strictly) to focus on Jenna's "tastey menu" of REAL stocks. Jaytee

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next