SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 48.31-0.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JDN who wrote (99769)2/24/2000 10:13:00 AM
From: Joseph J Randazzo  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
RE: AMD processors

General reply to all with an emphasis on the AMD fans,

I have twice gone non Intel with chips and, what a mistake both times. My latest disappointment involved a 366 K-6 equipped, purchased late last spring. Seemed like a grate value at the time. 1000 reboots later it has proven itself, time and again, to be inferior to a 233 PII. I run the same OS and software programs on both. They have the same RAM (sdram 64) and the same speed drives. The AMD system just gets plain slow after a days, and sometimes less, work. Never again. I have never had anyone I know, in the real world, give me any opinion in side by side performance, differing from mine. Maybe their new chips are and will be better. They might even approach Intel in terms of performance. But they will NEVER get in my pocket again.

Fyi, long Intel since '95, held AMD for a while but shortly after I bought that AMD equipped PC, I sold it.

Good luck to all.

Joey R
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext