Folks, if you consider the following, I think you'll find there's little reason to get hung up over what JT thinks or doesn't think about EDIG.
1) JT vehemently detests OTC level stocks. And relative to its prospective Nasdaq position, EDIG, as of this moment, is an OTC level stock. Thus, it naturally becomes fodder for his opinion.
2) JT prides himself with contrarian positions, particularly relative to OTC stocks where his skepticism historically has proven more right than wrong. And given the history of the way most OTC stocks perform, for him it's like shooting ducks. This might explain the gun rack on the pick-up truck. (LOL)
3) JT clearly enjoys a good debate. You should realize, more than anything, a good debate serves to stimulate his own way of thinking. He likes that and I suspect the only time he has difficulty arguing is when he looks in the mirror. (LOL)
So, folks, look at it this way: Can he be helpful? Yes. Can he be distracting with some of the language he uses and wrong with his opinion? Yes. Is he wrong in the instance of EDIG? The evidence indicates he is.
The question then becomes: Are you secure with your own investment? Therein lies the nitty-gritty; and therein lies the reason why he believes he is "the messenger."
How did computer language come into being? Well, there's a YES and a NO and a SEARCH. Same with humans, except there's a higher emotional factor involved with each characteristic. Jon, a software architect, likes to tap into and wreck havoc with all three. So it goes! |
