SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JC Jaros who wrote (28275)2/24/2000 10:36:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) of 64865
 
JC -
The hairball in question is any M$ desktop OS with an integrated browser. At least, that'd be my understanding.
That understanding is incorrect. NT was never included in the DOJ's discussions - probably because it has limited share as a desktop OS and no share in the consumer market, and this was after all about harm to consumers.

I'm quite sure there isn't a lack of motivated software engineers willing to safari into the Windows codebase, Rudedog.
While I don't claim to know every programmer in the world, I know about a hundred who are interested in Linux internals for every one who is interested in Windows.

In case you didn't know, the windows source code has been available to OEMs for years - they just can't ship a modified version. So it's not like the contents are a mystery. And it's not a "fun" bunch of code to work with. Even the softees who maintain it don't much like it.

There seems to be a tendency to shift the whole of the DOJ argument, remedies etc. to Win2K - but there just isn't anything in the trial testimony aimed that way, so I can't see Win2K being affected except in the most general sense of a restructuring of MSFT, something that I think is unlikely in our lifetimes.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext